ммммммммммммм ммм мммм мллллллллплпппппллм ммппппмммм млм мллллллллмммммлпп плл пллллллллллллллм плл млллмллммм пллллм плллллллмллмммллн лп пппллллллллллм он лллллллллллпплмоллл лллллм пплллоп Mo.iMP мллм плллллллнл оллллллллл олллл олллллн плп мллллллл ллллллллн оллллллллн ллл лллллл млллллллн олллллллл олллллллл п оллллллм мл млллллллн лллллллл ллллллллн оолллллллллп млплллллл мм ллллллллн ллолллллн оллллллпп млпллллллмллллмолллллллл ол пллллл м лнллллл м мл оллллллллллп ллллллллл плм плллмм ммлллп ол олллн ммлл лл ллллллллп ллллллллллм плм пплллллллллп мммп ллллмммммммлллллп плм млллп пллллллллллм ппмм ппмллпп пллм ппплплллллллпп ппппп ппллп ппппп ппппппппппппп ARRoGANT CoURiERS WiTH ESSaYS Grade Level: Type of Work Subject/Topic is on: [ ]6-8 [ ]Class Notes [Essay on Unification ] [ ]9-10 [ ]Cliff Notes [of Europe under the ] [x]11-12 [x]Essay/Report [Maastricht Treaty ] [ ]College [ ]Misc [ ] Dizzed: 10/94 # of Words:616 School: ? State: ? ФФФФФФФФФ>ФФФФФФФФФ>ФФФФФФФФФ>Chop Here>ФФФФФФФФФ>ФФФФФФФФФ>ФФФФФФФФФ>ФФФФФФФФФ Our position is to oppose the unification of Europe as proposed under the Maastricht Treaty, as being beneficial to Europe. We will prove beyond a reasonable doubt the uselessness of the treaty. The main principal of the Maastricht Treaty is European Unity. Unity is a nice warm hearted word which infers working towards a goal in harmony. The Maastricht Treaty sounds like an ideal proposal on paper, but in reality it can't work. In order to adopt the treaty several countries will have to make sacrifices. No body likes to make sacrifices. Countries with advancing economies like Germany will have to slow down to accommodate country's with poorer economic systems. Nations like England will have to merge their high currency rate with country's such as Italy, whom are infamous for their treasured currency the Lira. No one likes to get the short end of a stick - Why should these countries give up some of their prosperity to help others? Sure it will be quite an honourable effort but greed is an undisputable human characteristic (and we are talking about the merger of former economic rivals now in full cooperation!) Ultimately, these countries concerned with their own interests in mind will disregard the treaty. For example, during the last several weeks in defiance of the treaty Britain lowered it interest rates while Germany raised theirs. Both to accommodate their own separate economies! This sort of unity does not seem to me to set an example from which to abide by in the future. Under the Maastricht Treaty one body will govern and regulate both economic and political concerns. I find it hard to comprehend how one governing body can do the work of twelve individual governments in a continent whose culture and society are so diverse. If the nations now are incapable of settling their internal problems how can shifting the immense burden to a smaller less experienced group do anything but further complicate the situation. Sure it may be easier to decide upon a coarse of action - but controversial issues may only intensify or multiply if not carefully and appropriately addressed. The proof of such a failure between various ethnic groups and a detached government is the current intensifying conflict between different ethnic group in Yugoslavia, right next door to Greece. The Maastricht treaty also provides for the joint creation of a unified military defence force for Europe. Although, this sounds like a good proposal the immediate risk of any one country invading Europe is very remote. The threat of a Soviet takeover of Europe is now nonexistent (the huge Soviet Army has now been divided among the twelve independent countries whom still dispute over who own what). There are still NATO bases scattered all around Europe housing thousands of U.S troops so the need for a joint European military force is unpractical. The military aspect of the unification treaty is merely a an outdated cold war era stipulation, which may have been advantageous a decade ago but is now obsolete. Addressing, the gov's point Full approval from all nations on passing the treaty is not expected for some time. Denmark has already voted NO on the treaty and wants the treaty delayed until their objections have been met( sometime in 1993) In the same way, Britain will not endorse the treaty until it has been reworked and is satisfactory to the Danes. In contrast, France and Germany don't want the to negotiate the treaty only to clarify it with additional wording. Foreign Minister who can't agree now on the treaty will have similar success if the treaty passes. I conclude that The Maastricht treaty will not unite European countries but further divide them.