#: 14830 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 06-Apr-92 22:33:51 Sb: #14817-MM/1 Tech Manual Fm: GLEN HATHAWAY 71446,166 To: Mark Griffith 76070,41 (X) Hi Mark... Nope, I'm done complaining. I'll give Signetics and the others a call and see what info I can dig up. As for Paul Ward, all I want from him is my OSK manuals and an IO board. I guess if the price had to be $50 for the manual, he must have had his reasons. I know labor aint cheap. Bye... #: 14847 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 07-Apr-92 20:57:58 Sb: #14817-MM/1 Tech Manual Fm: Bob van der Poel 76510,2203 To: Mark Griffith 76070,41 While we're on the subject of the tech manual, I just got mine. Noticed an error on page 12.2 re the P1 jumpers. Pin 2 is not BUSY, rather it is connected to the P5 jumper pin 1/2 to enable AUTO FEED XT. The printer BUSY line (#11 on the centronics pinout) is not connected to the MM/1 (a design error in my humble opinion). Would have been nice to have BUSY connected to one of the many unused 68230 ports. Also, in the tech manual, it would have been nice to the pin assignments to the various chip ports listed. Well, that's what I think. I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong. #: 14831 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 06-Apr-92 22:39:17 Sb: #14823-MM/1 Tech Manual Fm: GLEN HATHAWAY 71446,166 To: Steve Wegert 76703,4255 Hi Steve... I'm going to get in trouble with Mark again, but here goes: I usually expect a tech manual to include detailed info on everything (hardware and some software). I guess that since the manufacturers will send you stuff for free that I don't need to complain about the lack of detail in some areas. But $50 does seem a little much for what you get. I saw tech manuals for the CoCo years ago - they were very good, as I recall. Anyway, enough griping. Must see what happens... #: 14833 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 07-Apr-92 00:50:02 Sb: #14829-#MM/1 Tech Manual Fm: LARRY OLSON 72227,3467 To: GLEN HATHAWAY 71446,166 (X) Glen, They will also send you a Data Handbook order form, which lists currently available publications. When I was looking up those publication numbers, I see another one that might be good to have... Phillips # 9398-373-80011 Development and System Evaluation for the SCC68070 I don't have that one...yet, looks like I'll be making another call :-) II hope you didn't have any trouble reading my reply, I did it while on-line. I should gather all that info and upload it, so its there if anyone else asks about it. Larry There is 1 Reply. #: 14835 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 07-Apr-92 01:34:25 Sb: #14833-#MM/1 Tech Manual Fm: GLEN HATHAWAY 71446,166 To: LARRY OLSON 72227,3467 (X) Hi Larry... Had no problem reading your reply. Thanks for the help. There is 1 Reply. #: 14836 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 07-Apr-92 01:59:45 Sb: #14835-#MM/1 Tech Manual Fm: LARRY OLSON 72227,3467 To: GLEN HATHAWAY 71446,166 (X) Glen, I just finished putting all that, plus some more, in a file that I will upload now, Glad to help There is 1 Reply. #: 14848 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 07-Apr-92 21:41:34 Sb: #14836-MM/1 Tech Manual Fm: GLEN HATHAWAY 71446,166 To: LARRY OLSON 72227,3467 Hi Larry... Thanks muchly! I see some (if not all) of that info is in the back of the tech manual, but if you're like me you'll not see it or ignore it. To have it all in one place where people will see it is a good idea. #: 14834 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK) 07-Apr-92 01:21:44 Sb: #14827-600 baud on /t0 Fm: Kevin Darling 76703,4227 To: Steve Wegert 76703,4255 Yeah, it's kind of like finding out that, say, a disk driver didn't like 32 track disks. It's just not something you notice... until you have a use for it. The other baud rates it won't do are: 75, 110, 134.5, 1800, 3600, 7200 and 38400. So using teletypes with /t0 might be impossible, too :-) kev #: 14837 S10/OS9/6809 (CoCo) 07-Apr-92 02:00:45 Sb: #14784-#Need GIME Fm: George Hendrickson 71071,2003 To: Kevin Darling 76703,4227 (X) I took the GIME chip out and cleaned the connections on it and in its socket and still got the same results. I was wondering if the chip I have was one of the old ones or the supposably update GIME chip. The info I got off of it is this: 627v8984 2645A0001 TCC1014 Tandy 1986 Is that one of the old ones or one of the new ones? Does CRC have any GIMeE chips also? There are 2 Replies. #: 14838 S10/OS9/6809 (CoCo) 07-Apr-92 05:21:43 Sb: #14837-Need GIME Fm: Kevin Darling 76703,4227 To: George Hendrickson 71071,2003 Drat. The new part is TCC1014A, I believe. The Tandy stock number is MX-0992 for the CoCo-3. Hey, I bet Frank Hogg has some GIMEs! He's been posting here lately, so either he'll spot your question or you can ask him here or in email. Luck! #: 14846 S10/OS9/6809 (CoCo) 07-Apr-92 20:23:34 Sb: #14837-Need GIME Fm: Frank Hogg of FHL 70310,317 To: George Hendrickson 71071,2003 George, I have GIMEs in stock. Probably the last known supply of them. Call the office for details. I don't think I can quote prices etc here. (rules you know) Frank Hogg -- FHL 315-469-7364 #: 14840 S14/misc/info/Soapbox 07-Apr-92 05:36:32 Sb: #14787-#I Give Up Fm: Kevin Darling 76703,4227 To: Mark Griffith 76070,41 (X) Good grief. What rubbish. It's only been a little over a year since the MM/1 even became available, and only months at most since people have gotten up to speed on OSK. I sure don't know of any "promised software package" that's "waiting on the window interface" alone. During this period anyone who wanted to begin developing anything has done so. Just look at what Mike Haaland, Zack Sessions, and Mike Knudsen have created. All changes during this period have been so minor that gfx programs (and most programmers are text-oriented instead) have been changed via a quick recompile or even by simply using dEd on the binary. There's a lot more development going on that you don't know about, but most people I've talked to have been held up by three things: 1) Waiting for hard disk setups (a lot of people refuse to do anything until they have one ... I don't blame them). 2) Needing docs if they weren't C programmers (a valid complaint, altho if someone pays me $300 like is needed for G-Windows, I'll come to their HOME and help! :-) And 3) discouragement from you because you didn't agree with their program ideas. I don't know why you've been insulting almost everyone on the cocolist... or why you felt it necessary to sneak over to Delphi and muckrake my stuff (and others') where you thought we wouldn't find out. Or why you think how I spend my freely given time is subject to your approval. But I sure wish you'd stop. And I think you'll find many people agree! There are 2 Replies. #: 14844 S14/misc/info/Soapbox 07-Apr-92 20:18:51 Sb: #14840-I Give Up Fm: Mark Griffith 76070,41 To: Kevin Darling 76703,4227 (X) Kevin, >It's only been a little over a year since the MM/1 even became available. Go back a few years. I got the first MM/1 boards to make back in August 1990. They were being given out to developers at the October Fest that year. You had one too, remember? Since that time the only applications to come out have been what was available then with the execption of Bob's VED and VPRINT. I'm talking about Mike Haaland's PAINT, TEXTRIX, and FONTASEE and Zacks games. Big deal. Developers have had machines since before then and there is nothing to show for it. >3) discouragement from you because you didn't agree with their program >ideas. I don't know why you've been insulting almost everyone on the >cocolist... or why you felt it necessary to sneak over to Delphi.... You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is. If you think I talked about you "over there" without knowing you would hear about it, you are even more out of touch then I thought. If it pissed you off enough to finish the product, I accomplished my goal. If it didn't make any difference, then I wasted a lot of effort. I seriously doubt if the MM/1 effort will make it now. Too many mistakes have been made. Your windows stuff may give it the shot in the arm it needs (I hope). It may also be a case of too little too late. Time will tell. You can go back into hibernation now. Mark #: 14845 S14/misc/info/Soapbox 07-Apr-92 20:22:41 Sb: #14840-I Give Up Fm: Frank Hogg of FHL 70310,317 To: Kevin Darling 76703,4227 (X) >$300 is needed for G-Windows Kev, GWindows is just $200 for the TC70 not $300. It is not available for the MM1 at this time and no price has been set or will be until it is/if available. However you have to remember that GWindows includes G-Desktop (a GUI) and a whole bunch of utilities that are not included with K-Windows. Perhaps I shouldn't say what is or is not included with K-Windows until I know. Does 'anybody' know exactly what you get with K-Windows??? BTW now that you own your very own TC70 and can get K-Windows done for it... Just when will you get that huh huh huh??? (Sorry, couldn't resist) Frank Hogg #: 14841 S9/Utilities 07-Apr-92 16:30:16 Sb: #14774-Help Fm: ole hansen 100016,3417 To: George Hendrickson 71071,2003 Hello George I will send you a mail with the phone-number in a day or two. I will also upload to Library-12-OS9 a 'demo'-version that will give you an idea of the product. It will be called os9max.lzh best regards ole b. hansen #: 14842 S9/Utilities 07-Apr-92 16:32:15 Sb: #14774-Help Fm: ole hansen 100016,3417 To: George Hendrickson 71071,2003 hello again Yes it will handle hd-diskettes (1.28MB(32-sectors/track(256-bytes))) regards ole b. hansen #: 14843 S10/OS9/6809 (CoCo) 07-Apr-92 17:13:13 Sb: #14816-OS9 level 2/disk basic 2 Fm: paul Mooney 100015,134 To: Wayne Day 76703,376 many thanks for all the help, I'll check it out, thanks again, paul #: 14849 S1/General Interest 07-Apr-92 21:52:47 Sb: Mac and OSK Fm: Frank Hogg of FHL 70310,317 To: all I've just uploaded to section 15 a announcment and review of OSK for the Mac. Check it out. The filename is 'MAC.OSK' Frank Hogg -- FHL #: 14850 S7/Telecommunications 07-Apr-92 22:04:28 Sb: OSTerm Fm: Paul Rinear 73757,1413 To: Anyone Does anyone out there use OSTerm on the Coco? I've been trying it out and I like it, but there seems to be a couple of bugs. In learn mode after a certain number of keystrokes the program terminates with a divide by zero error. Also, if Cntl-C is hit at any time, the program terminates. This is a pain when logging on to CIS. Actually, I could live with it if the first bug were fixed. I've tried contacting Vaughn Cato by Internet and also by US Mail with no luck. Can anyone give any suggestions? Thanks, Paul R. Press !>