(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
January 15, 1993
YORKUFE.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Warren York.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SCALAR TECHNOLOGY
MASS VS. ENERGY
[ E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2-> ]
UNIFIED FIELD EQUATION
When I first started writing articles on scalar technology in
Extraordinary Science three years ago I received phone calls asking
if I thought Einstein's equation E=MC^2 was wrong or somehow
incorrect? At that time I did not find fault with the equation and
said it was correct as is. Something did not look right, but I did
not know enough at that time to put my finger on just what it was.
Due to new developments in our research, we now feel we know what
was missing in the original equation. The original equation still
stands true but is lacking an in-depth description of factors that
up to now were taken as just understood or unrelated as the equation
stands alone.
Gravity is a curved flow of SPACE/TIME. That is to say gravity is
the geometry of space/time flow where Matter takes on a linear
vectorial motion known as Time. Since one is made up of the other
this now introduces two new factors to the equation. The one factor
known as TIME and is the whole basis of what relativity is formed
around. Maybe not actual time but more so its effect relative to
where one is viewing the event taking place at that instant of time.
Let me give a very common example of what I mean. When one looks at
a distant star, he or she is actually looking at a natural time
machine. The events of that light from that star may have taken
place thousands upon thousands of years before the observer actually
looks up and sees the light as it reaches earth. At 186K miles/sec
[distance/speed] that actual light has long passed and that star
might not even be in existence anymore.
An even more common example would be right here on earth in most
peoples livingrooms: the television set. Let's say, there are two
observers in the room. Observer A and observer B are both looking at
the same set at the exact same instant. Is it the wave property or a
photon particle property that strikes the eyes of both A and B at
Page 1
the same instant? It does not matter if it is the wave property or
the particle property [duality] that is taking over. The event will
always be different in time depending on where each observer is
sitting even though ever so slightly different.
If it were a wave property, the time would be almost undetectable
but still slightly different in a moment of time. If it were a
particle property then the photon that strikes the eye of one
observer cannot be the exact same photon that strikes the eyes of
the second and so forth. Now why is this so important? It introduces
TIME as a variable factor in our energy to matter or matter to
energy equation [E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2->].
Until now, this time factor has just been taken for granted and
thought of as understood. The problem with this assumption is that
at least three if not more, types of time exist:
1) Present time where a conjugate wave of light goes back on
itself to the source,
2) negative time where events are perceived in the past, and
3) positive time where events are predicted and take place in
the future.
The key to understanding Einstein's original equation E=MC^2 lies in
understanding what Einstein understood but others were only able to
speculate on. That understanding lies in just what is the process
called MASS. At what point does energy become MASS, and at what
point does mass become ENERGY? We all know that mass [solid objects]
are all made up of energy but what or where is the changeover point
from one to the other? We also know that supposedly nothing can go
faster than light [186K miles/sec]. If this is true then just what
did Einstein mean by C2 in his famous equation E=MC^2?
By definition C2 means C [186K miles/sec] times C [186K miles/sec]
which would equal 3.4596e+10 miles/sec. This would be much faster
than C as we know it. How can this be? What point are we missing
that Einstein understood? The following is an understanding of just
what Mass and time are as derived from scalar technology which may
shed light on this matter.
TIME is the linear motion of energy changing position from point to
point along its world line (Vector). The period in which energy
changes position is known as frequency.
MASS is the counter-rotating birotational (nonlinear) motion of
energy which must be considered a matter particle at this point
without respect to a world line (Nonvectorial). Mass experiences
time and gives up energy as it travels through space, but inherent
time is cancelled within itself by the positive and negative aspects
of BIROTATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM as a singularity.
Interaction with energy, loss or gain, produces frequency
oscillations and thus time for mass because it produces change in
the mass particle. As a particle of mass decays, it returns energy
to the energy cycle. Therefore, mass may be thought of as energy in
a "semi-frozen" oriented form or as a multi-dimensional hologram.
Page 2
[ Summation symbol sub L = 0 ]
ROTATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM [1]
No TIME exists within the matter particle itself.
(No Change) (Photons added/subtracted = change = time)
This now means that E=MC^2 has a hidden variable which till now has
been overlooked as a real tangible factor known as TIME. To indicate
this factor the symbols [ * ] meaning rotational and [ <-> ] meaning
birotational or CW & CCW rotations-[vectors].
That would make the equation E=MC^*<-2-> but we would rather it be
displayed as [E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2-> ] so as not to detract or take
away in any manner from the great work of Albert Einstein. His would
be the simplistic and our equation would be the scalar form giving
the extra dimension known as time. This now opens up Pandora's box.
This means TIME is a real variable and may be engineered the same as
matter to energy and the counterpart which is still unproven but
known to exist, energy to matter.
The following are postulates derived by experimentation and study
done into plotting the fields in scalar technology. Pay close
attention to the wording.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
VER 2.02 JD92365
*Postulates from York's New Unified Field Theory*
1. Energy to mass stages
a. Motion produces an arc ->
arc produces a vortex ->
vortex produces polarity ->
opposing polarity produces charge->
charge produces lattice ->
lattice produces structure ->
structure produces form
2. Orientation between Maxwellian and basic time continuum
a. Mass [birotational energy] normally has oscillatory
motion in nature.
* Ex: Electrons in motion in an antenna. [RF radiation]
* Ex: Energy with oscillatory motion would be a laser or
[photon] oscillatory motion.
b. Energy [linear] normally has bilateral rotational motion
in nature.
* Ex: An electron [mass particle] is an example of energy
[photon particles] still unaccepted but our
interpretation of the makeup of an Electron itself.
* Ex: Of mass bilateral rotation would be a Tesla coil
producing longitudinal waves. [RC] - Reciprocating
Current
Page 3
3. Mass vs. Energy
a. Counter-rotating orbital rotational energy = MASS
* In our equation[ E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2-> ].
Note: This is what C^*<-2-> represents.
b. Electrons may consist of counter-rotating orbital photons
* The upper rotating cluster [direction of electron flow]
has more photons than the lower counter-rotating cluster.
The true form is that of a Chaotic Streamline guided by
the Hopf Ellipse. [2]
c. * The force on the poles of the counter-rotating orbital
photons is at 45 degrees to the magnetic pole of the
electron which they make up, a part of the optical
property of photons.
d. * Photons have orbital motion in a magnetic field and just
spin as a singularity.
4. Maxwellian vs. Einsteinian
a. Free electrons = electrostatic field
b. Orbital electrons = space/time displacement = WEAK Force
c. Alignment of space/time displacement [orbital
electrons] = STRONG Force
5. Gyroscopic action
a. Gyroscopic action fixes/sets re-orientation of
space/time within one relativity consisting
of at least four dimensions.
* Orbital rotation is gyroscopic action.
6. Constants vs. non-constants
a. The speed of light is not constant.
* We are limited to the detection of events at the speed of
light in our relativity. EX: Take a wide flat rubberband
and mark one inch on it to represent 186K mps [speed of
light]
b. The distance of a speed of light is constant relative to
its frame of reference.
* Now stretch the rubberband and mark on a flat piece of
paper the new length of the DISTANCE of the speed of light.
The new extended line is still the distance of the speed of
light, but the speed relative to the unstretched line must
be FTL because we are still using the line from our
original relativity. [4D]
Page 4
7. Energy/Mass/Time/Space
a. Mass traveling at or near the speed of light does not
actually become infinite but only SEEMS to from the view
of the observer [A] and nothing has actually changed from
the view of [B] the observer doing the motion except [DSL]
the distance of the speed of light.
* Special Relativity is not needed to explain this action.
The observation of mass reaching infinity by [A] is due to
space/time being stretched and bent around [B] the
traveler.
b. All matter stretches [alters] space/TIME [the distance of
the speed of light] as one passes through the other.
* The time is what is altered [stretched] not the amount of
space itself. This process is known as time lensing. This
is also known as perception. [To perceive you must have
change]
c. Light-shift/frequency-spectrum is due to the SLUSH effect
of space/time [lensing].
d. Frequency = Angle of bent space/time
* Bent space/time acts as a prism for color separation
8. Mathematical assumptions in true relativity
a. In more than one relativity [4D] Mathematically, actions
are NOT ADDITIVE but are a PRODUCT of each other.
Ex:C^2 In relativity [singular or one set of 4D] actions
are mathematically additives except for the speed of light
itself.
Ex: [C' + C'] Note: C'= one set distance of the speed of
light within one singular or prime relativity.
9. Gravity - Unification field
a. Gravity is a PROCESS not a particle. A push-pull force
[pump]. It is more of a PUSH than a pull force.
* This is part of the distance squared law. If you are at
the arc of the field flow it is a PUSH and if you are in
closer to the mass you are in the counter-rotating flow and
it is a PULL force. [ButterflyField-Pattern]
We feel these postulates are the basic building blocks of our
fundamental particles. We do not feel gravitons or quarks exist as
sub-particles and no such evidence has been brought forward beyond a
shadow of a doubt to prove the QCD concept. The photon itself has
pre-energy levels which is beyond the scope of this paper at this
time. The postulates and concepts are far from being finished and
work is currently advancing in a positive direction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5
REFERENCES
1. Laboratory Manual, Physics and experimental Science by H.E.
White, D.H. White, Mauri Gould, 1968
2. Nonlinear Dynamics of Structures, by R.M. Kiehn, "Compact
dissipative flow structures with tgopological coherence,
embedded in eulerian environments" 1989 IUTAM meeting on
Topological Fluid Mechanics
December 30, 1992
By: Warren E. York
[915] 581-3931
and
Charlotte Geier
[915] 581-0581
* INFO/NET, 7101 N. Mesa, Suite 133, El Paso, Texas 79912 *
END
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6